← Research

Trends in general practitioner dispensing of thickeners in the NHS England, 2019–24

Published research abstract. A single study is not conclusive evidence or personal advice.

The published abstract

Introduction: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is common and often results in aspiration. Thickeners are widely used to thicken liquids to slow the liquid bolus and prevent aspiration and aspiration pneumonia, despite multiple concerns about their use. To date, there is little data on prescribing/dispensing practices. This study aims to provide the first overview of thickener dispensing practices, serve as foundational material for parties interested in research, practice and policy making, and guide further work in this area. Method: We explored English general practitioner thickener dispensing practices for the five-year period 2019–2024 via the NHS Business Services Authority ePACT2 database and using descriptive statistics and linear regression to analyse the data. We hypothesized that with a large data set, it would be possible to detect trends in dispensing.

Results: Between 2019 and 2024, nearly three million thickening items were dispensed in primary care in England at a cost of nearly 90 million sterling. Thickened liquids is primarily an intervention for older people although there was a significant decreasing trend in dispensed thickener items in adult populations. Thickener dispensing has increased in the youngest age group (0–1-years-old). The cost of thickeners to the NHS has risen in the last year under study despite the significant decline in use observed for most age groups. Of dispensed items over the five-year period, the vast majority were gum-based.

Conclusion: While the data provided in this study is limited to GP dispensed thickeners in England, it provides researchers, clinicians and policy makers with initial information on dispensing practices. From the available data, a decreasing dispensing trend is seen in the context of rising costs, older people comprise the population who primarily receive thickeners and gum-based products dominate the market. This study raises a number of questions regarding the use of thickeners for people with swallowing problems.

SourcePLOS One ↗CC-BY-4.0

Published abstract reproduced; formatting adapted.

Source details & publication history

The authors’ published research abstract, not an England Today news report or medical advice. A single study does not establish a universal conclusion. Read the full paper for methods, limitations, funding and subsequent publisher notices.

Publication history

Published by the source
23 July 2026
Updated by the source
Not supplied by this feed
First recorded here
18 Oct, 20:59 BST
Last checked
18 Oct, 22:49 BST
Scope
England-focused research

Earlier recorded version · 18 Oct, 20:59 BST

Trends in general practitioner dispensing of thickeners in the NHS England, 2019–24

Introduction: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is common and often results in aspiration. Thickeners are widely used to thicken liquids to slow the liquid bolus and prevent aspiration and aspiration pneumonia, despite multiple concerns about their use. To date, there is little data on prescribing/dispensing practices. This study aims to provide the first overview of thickener dispensing practices, serve as foundational material for parties…

Source & reuse record

Declared licence
CC-BY-4.0
Permitted fields in this edition
Published abstract with creator credit and explicit unrestricted Creative Commons Attribution copyright statement
Basis recorded
McCurtin et al This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Publisher policy reviewed
2026-10-18
Source record fingerprint
a70c587c9e3552142ca77c2d7e1e78b82e4450e106faf283f298d9a1b67ff0ac
Download source record ↓

McCurtin et al This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract reproduced as plain text; the listing extract is shortened. Full article text and tables are not imported. Any displayed research figure has a separate review bound to this exact paper and retains its original credit and caption. No endorsement of England Today is implied. Provenance records document the source and declared reuse terms; they are not legal clearance or independent verification.

Publisher reuse policy ↗